Removal of a Dangerous Dog’s Required Microchip
A person knowingly and willfully removes a microchip implanted under the dangerous-dog registration requirement.
Florida Statute
§ 767.12(5)(a)1.c.
Removal of a Dangerous Dog’s Required Microchip
Verified against the 2026 Florida Statutes: October 13, 2026
Quick Summary
A person knowingly and willfully removes a microchip implanted under the dangerous-dog registration requirement.
Classification Matrix
Use this as a quick classification reference. Specific facts, statutory circumstances, and charging allegations may affect the applicable result.
Removal of a Dangerous Dog’s Required Microchip
F.S. § 767.12(5)(a)1.c.
A person knowingly and willfully removes a microchip implanted under the dangerous-dog registration requirement.
Elements of the Offense
Elements of the Offense
Elements marked AND are cumulative. Elements marked OR identify statutory alternatives; one applicable alternative must be established when that theory is charged. Conditional elements apply only to the identified statutory track.
- Element 1AND — Required
All elements required — AND (OR alternatives within an element)
The microchip was implanted pursuant to the dangerous-dog identification requirement in § 767.12(5)(a)1.c.
Plain language: The microchip was implanted pursuant to the dangerous-dog identification requirement in § 767.12(5)(a)1.c.
- Element 2AND — Required
All elements required — AND (OR alternatives within an element)
The defendant removed that microchip.
Plain language: The defendant removed that microchip.
- Element 3AND — Required
All elements required — AND (OR alternatives within an element)
The removal was knowing AND willful.
Plain language: The removal was knowing AND willful.
Jury Instructions
Jury Instructions
Instruction N/A
No offense-specific standard jury instruction located
Reviewed the Florida Bar criminal instruction set updated October 9, 2026; no dedicated instruction for § 767.12(5)(a)1.c. was located. These elements are a statutory field summary; consult the State Attorney for case-specific instructions.
View Official InstructionVerified against the official instruction source: October 13, 2026
Important Definitions
Important Definitions
Animal control authority
A locally authorized entity enforcing animal-control laws; where none serves the area, the county sheriff serves this role.
Additional Notes
Additional Notes
Quick Reference
A person knowingly and willfully removes a microchip implanted under the dangerous-dog registration requirement.
Classification
Third Degree felony under § 767.12(5)(a)1.c..
Official Source
Verified against the 2026 Florida Statutes on October 13, 2026. https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2026/767.12
Police canine and service-dog exemptions
Section 767.16(1) exempts canines owned or employed by law enforcement from Part II. Section 767.16(2) only exempts qualifying currently rabies-vaccinated service dogs from post-bite quarantine; it is not a blanket exemption from criminal liability.
Any person; required microchip only
The removal offense applies to any person, not just the dog’s owner. Establish that the chip was implanted under § 767.12(5)(a)1.c.; ordinary pet microchip removal alone does not establish this offense.